Peer Review Process

   Peer Review and Editorial Process

To ensure an efficient, secure, and transparent workflow, the journal utilizes ManuscriptPortal.com, a dedicated professional platform based on Open Journal Systems (OJS), to manage all submissions and the peer review process. Authors are highly recommended to submit their manuscripts directly through ManuscriptPortal.com. Authors also can submit their manuscripts to journal office at: eurokdpublishing@gmail.com   

Immediately following submission, all manuscripts undergo a primary assessment to ensure they are complete and meet the journal’s basic submission requirements. Papers that pass this initial check are then evaluated by the Editor for alignment with the journal’s scope and academic suitability. Eligible manuscripts proceed to a rigorous double-blind peer review by at least two independent, anonymous experts. Reviewers’ feedback is shared with the author(s) so they can revise and improve their work. The Editor retains full responsibility for the final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of any manuscript, and this decision is final.

Reviewers' general recommendation:

• Accept
• Minor Revision
• Major Revision
• Reject & Resubmit
• Reject

Reviewers' recommendation for the quality of written language:

• It is not suitable for publication unless extensively revised and edited
• It needs some corrections and improvements before being published
• It is acceptable

Reviewers' recommendation for the level of interest:

• It is an exceptional article
• It is important in its field
• Its findings are important to those with closely related research interests
• It is an article of limited interest

Reviewers can provide confidential comments to the editors.

Reviewers ought to provide comments, preferably specific and detailed, to the author.

Editor’s Decision is Final

Referees advise the editor-in-chief, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the manuscript. 

Guidelines for Journal Reviewers

Please click here to learn more about the Guidelines for Editors and Reviewers.

A diagram illustrating the review and publication workflow is provided below: